The issue of men posing as women needing a place to pee in public institutions, is being renewed with fervor, and the rise of a political class of the “reasonable transsexual” is being fomented in America. Congresswoman, Nancy Mace, apparently hitting “peak tran$,” along with the rest of Americans who voted for a second Trump presidency, has created a media stir over her insistence that two-time Delaware Senator and U.S. Representative elect, Sarah (Tim) McBride must use the men’s bathroom in accordance with his sex, while at work.
Mace is unimpressed with McBride’s "Gender identity." She is not quite at the point of realizing that gender identity is more than a belief system, but she is getting warm.
Gender identity is the colonization of womanhood, specifically women’s capacities to reproduce the species. Gender ideology is the cult doctrine supporting this process of colonization. And, the gender industry is this process at industry scale, selling us all on the reasonableness of men’s colonization of womanhood.
There are no reasonable or good men posing as women. There are no reasonable or good men attempting to claim womanhood for themselves. There are no reasonable or good men wearing simulacrums of women’s anatomy, regardless of what bathroom they are using. Men taking what does not belong to them is not reasonable. These men breaching the barrier of women’s public bathrooms, will be the least of our problems soon enough, because men posing as women are a rising political class. These men are coming for womanhood itself, while getting off on performing our sexual subordination. They are no longer just speaking for us, but speaking as us in the ruling chambers of congress.
When we get to the point where we can understand this process thoroughly, the myth of the “transgender person,” a corporate construct that allows for this colonization of womanhood, will dissipate like morning dew in emerging sunlight, and we can begin to develop strong strategies to end it.
Every man posing as a woman is engaging in a process of colonization, whether they call themselves men, women, girls, transwomen, trans-identified males, or anything else. This process has become a global compulsion, as it is now industrialized. It is no longer reserved for a select group of men walking the red-light districts. It has now entered the halls of power. These men feel entitled to womanhood. They believe it is theirs for the taking, that they can create us from their own projections. They have been emboldened by legal policies created and financially solidified by other men with the paraphilia of transsexualism (autogynephilia), to publicly perform the sexual objectification, society reserves for women. Make no mistake, performing women’s sexually objectified social status is the paraphilia - not being women, but being men’s sexually objectified projection of women.
The intrusions of these men into the spheres of political and financial power, where they further the undermining of women’s rights, and our ability to resist our colonization, is growing.
The difference between men who attempt to colonize womanhood, and women who appropriate simulacrums of male anatomy, by using medical technology to disguise their sex, is not just the impulse behind the act. Women are running from sexual subjugation and humiliation. Women - especially young women - appropriate, and mime the social, legal, and financial power they do not possess - male power. Men are performing women’s subordination, sexualizing it, and pretending they are the subordinated. Under this ruse, they seek to convince especially women, that they are in fact more oppressed than women, and it’s working. This process of grooming can be likened to Ted Bundy walking around college campuses at night, with an armload of books, asking women for help, as he hobbles and fumbles in the dark with crutches and a fake cast.
Colonization is control of a political area that does not belong to the party doing the colonizing. It is seizure and taking control of an area, culture, or territory - in this case, womanhood. It is large scale political control. Gender ideology both obscures this process and is the doctrine which supports the process. It tells us that what is happening is not happening but is something else entirely. Orwell would be impressed.
Appropriation is different than colonization. It is an act of taking some things from another culture and adopting them, without realizing the context, or realizing but not caring about the context. Colonization is the larger political system that allows for appropriation. Men’s fetish of adopting characteristics of women’s sexual subordination, along with simulacrums of their anatomy, calling themselves women, and being socially, legally, and politically accepted in this acquisition, is the larger political force that compels women to appropriate simulacrums of men’s biology. Miming someone else’s power, is not the same as miming their subordination.
Men performing women’s sexual subordination understand they can stop at any time. Their performance of “being women” is a tourist attraction, while for women, it is our day-to-day reality. Men who colonize womanhood know this. It is part of the kink.
Men posing as women are accruing significant political, legal, and social power, under this system of claiming legal womanhood. They also now have the technical capacity to literally colonize womanhood through rapidly advancing reproductive technologies, and the emergence of the political class of the “reasonable transsexual.”
Brain dead women are being explored as incubators for children. Exploration of creating embryos from skin cells are underway. Ectogenesis and wombs for men are being researched. The revenue from surrogacy will advance into the hundreds of billions of dollars by 2034, while the overall global technological reproduction market is poised to leap to $1.7 Trillion. Children are being taught their reproductive systems are detachable commodities, and that they can be born through technology.
Men with the compulsion of being perceived as women, of owning women’s biology for performance and titillation, created the vast structure of laws now in use under the guise of a human rights movement. Powerful and rich men, performing women’s subordinate sexual status for kink, such as Martine (Martin) Rothblatt and Jennifer (James) Pritzker have driven the cult doctrine which supports the colonization of womanhood institutionally, politically, and corporately.
While the decade old barbarism of medical assaults on young people’s healthy reproductive systems, marketed as healthcare, have finally come to the fore, through the work of thousands of activists, feminists, parents, whistleblowers, journalists, and average people attempting to break the bounds of the censorious mainstream media, the narrative of the “trans child,” is slowly giving way to the “reasonable transsexual.” This brand of power, posing as success for the marginalized, is epitomized currently by men like Olympian, Caitlyn (Bruce) Jenner, Congressman elect, McBride, State Senator, Danica (Dan) Roem of Virginia, and U.S. Assistant Secretary of Health, Rachel (Richard) Levine.
Perceived with rare clarity by a man resisting gender ideology, Nathanael Blake noted in a recent Federalist article, “McBride and his allies know that this fight is about much more than where one politician pees. Rather, they are seeking to establish — at the very core of American government — that men have an absolute right to access women’s private spaces.” He goes on to tell us, “Their goal is to eliminate women’s ability to say no to men who invade their spaces. Gender ideology demands the eradication of the barriers put in place to protect women from predatory men. It proclaims that a man is a woman as soon as he says he is — and that he must be treated as such under penalty of law.”
After recently marking women’s territory as his own, by taking a selfie in a women’s bathroom, McBride conceded to not use women’s restrooms at the Whitehouse, after he was confronted by Congresswoman Nancy Mace. He made a very “reasonable” statement, saying bathrooms were not his interest, that he'd keep his focus on the kitchen table issues that got him to congress, 'I’m not here to fight about bathrooms,” he said. “I’m here to fight for Delawareans and to bring down costs facing families.”
A YouTube video of McBride grilling a lawmaker attempting to pass a bill to protect women and girls in their own sports category, clearly exposes his actual intentions.
Olympian Jenner, the poster boy for men colonizing womanhood when it was ushered into mainstream America in 2015 as progressive, saw Jenner posing on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine in a woman’s corset, joking about raiding his daughter’s underwear drawer. Jenner is now back in the spotlight. He ran and lost a race for Governor of California, in 2021 and is now, alongside McBride, positioning himself as a “reasonable transsexual,” with another attempted run at being Governor. He doesn’t believe that men should be playing in women’s sports.
How reasonable.
Even Elon Musk, who lost his son to the cult of gender ideology which supports the public and political rise of fetishistic men, thinks so. He recently posted his support of a statement made by Jenner on his X platform, and had his photo taken with him and president elect Trump, the day after Trump won the election, inviting public ridicule of MAGA.
Roem, the first male State Legislator to pose as a woman, preceding McBride, echoed his “reasonableness” by stating to his own constituency, “The voters have shown they want a leader who will prioritize fixing roads, feeding kids and protecting our land instead of stigmatizing trans kids or taking away your civil rights.” The last part of his statement indicates his actual priority of keeping the lie of the “transgender child” alive and well.
McBride has been politically groomed for his position, along with Levine, and Roem, by the Victory Institute, an institution, fueling the Global Pipeline of LGBTQ+ leaders, funded by powerful philanthropic billionaires, and the financially bloated LGBTQ+ NGOs.
Jenner however leads the pack of the new political class of the “reasonable transsexual.” He’s been there from the beginning; he is a familiar face. People loved him when he was an Olympic star, and not posing as a woman.
Jenner was denounced by the Victory Institute when he recently decided he may like to run for Governor of California again. The Victory Institute claimed, “while Jenner is running as an out trans person, [he’s] doing it while throwing trans kids under the bus, telling TMZ that [he] supports laws banning trans kids from sports.”
Jenner is the perfect decoy for acceptance of the “reasonable transsexual,” and the unabated colonization of womanhood. He is republican, a fan of Trump, and not part of the “crazy left.” He has been trounced by and cast out of the Victory Institute for being a traitor. It’s like he rode in on a white horse to assuage any inconsistencies the republicans may exhibit around inviting men attempting to colonize womanhood, into the halls of political power. Jenner, after all, doesn’t believe men should play alongside women in sports. He is the ultimate, “reasonable transsexual.”
Author and Journalist, Jennifer Bilek, has been researching the money and power behind the gender industry for over a decade. Her work can be found in myriad publications, on her blog, on Twitter, Gettr, LinkedIn, Spinster.xyz, at this Substack, and in her new book: Transsexual Transgender Transhuman/Dispatches from the 11th Hour.
You can purchase my book at Spinifex Press in Australia, order from your local bookstore, or on Amazon US, UK, Germany, Ireland, and Canada, where it is already trending #1 on in LGBTQ+ Demographic Studies new releases. Please leave reviews if you appreciate the research. You may also support my work with a one off donation, which are always appreciated, or by purchasing a subscription to my substack.
This is the scary part to me and whittles it down to their ultimate goal "Children are being taught their reproductive systems are detachable commodities, and that they can be born through technology."
Brilliantly and clearly articulated, thank you. The ideology isn’t going anywhere anytime soon and the ideologues are going to try to pull the wool over people’s eyes in whatever way they can. They have the money behind them and they’re well organised. Unfortunately, lots of people are easily led and are quite happy to accept that 2+2=5. This period in our history is a perfect example of how a small number of well organised people can control the majority.