“Gender Identity”: A Corporate Fiction
There is zero difference between people being called "transgender" & the rest of us, in the sense that we’re all biological & exist as part of a sexually dimorphic species. We're all tethered to reality by our sex. The mysterious, otherworldliness created around people who medically disown their sex is a corporate construction, a fiction. It is purposeful, powerful, and dangerous.
The creation of this corporate fiction is one step toward attempting to overlay a virtual reality onto the natural world and to construct a religion out of technology. Elites at the highest levels of our technocracy have been speaking about technologies so advanced that they provide us with god-like qualities for at least fifty years, probably longer.
Thanks for reading Jennifer’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
The current iteration of this ideology, established by the technocracy we live in, is meant to ensconce us in a virtual or cyber world to which the natural world is subjugated. With its massive propaganda apparatus, it has only taken a decade to convince the populace that there is a unique type of human, untethered to the biosphere like the rest of us, mere “biological people.”
The political left (media and politicians) is helping to manifest this virtual reality driving a narrative of unique, ethereal humans, unattached to the ecosystem & needing special rights within law & society.
The political right (media and politicians) is linguistically supporting this edifice whenever they argue that “transgender women” don’t belong in “biological women’s” sports, prisons, colleges, etc. They solidify the illusion of another type of human that is not biological at every turn. Until the media focuses on tearing down the faulty premise of people outside of the parameters of our sexed reality, this exercise of building a virtual reality for us to live in will only continue to be solidified. The premise of alternate humans must be attacked along with the political lobby fostering the illusion.
Corporations, banks, international investment houses, governments, legal institutions, and influential non-governmental organizations (NGOs) market the idea that we are not a sexually dimorphic species. They don’t care about the identity issues of a minuscule part of the population. It is patently ridiculous to think so. They are marketing disembodiment. “Gender,” currently being promoted as a revolutionary human rights movement to set us free, is an industry posing as social progress for the people. It seeks to deconstruct human reproductive sex for profit and human engineering. It is posited that our freedom will emerge when technology takes over where human reproduction ends. When this purported dead weight of human reproduction ends, male & female will be obsolete. We can then live as our “authentic selves” beyond male and female, youth and adult, beyond material existence and its limitations.
Our sex is being commodified, reduced to parts, toward this end. This occurs via the normalization of the male sexual fetish of transsexualism being promoted corporately and the appropriation of medical, synthetic simulacrums of women’s wholly sexed humanity. The term “Transgender” is a rebranding of this fetish and works as an ad campaign for this burgeoning industry. The “trans” flag is its logo - which is why it replaced the POW flag at the White House during “trans” awareness week in 2019. It’s why we see it everywhere. The wares this industry traffics in are uteruses, sperm, ovaries, eggs, and synthetic facsimiles of penises, breasts, and vaginas. There are now international forums promoting these wares, AI facial mapping, genetic screening, remaking of the human body, and lawyering to make all the transactions tidy. Investors are lining up. Women are being systematically reduced, in language and law, to “cervix havers,” “menstruators,” “gestators,” and “bleeders” because they have the lion’s share of responsibility for the reproduction of our species which technocratic elites are attempting to colonize.
The male sexual fetish of transsexualism, a compulsion to own female biology for oneself, has been rebranded to "transgenderism” because a male fetish would be a tough sell to any population. "Transgender" sounds cool and edgy & feels mutinous for teens filled with the rebellious spirit of youth who are clueless about the repercussions of being sterilized by the drugs & surgeries being marketed to them. Claiming synthetic sex, a corporately manufactured illusion, has become the medical-tech generation’s counterpart to getting a secret tattoo. These kids adopting synthetic sex identities have grown up online with cyber identities & have had their personalities medicalized since they were old enough to talk, while previous generations were out exploring the real world. They and their parents have been fed an array of disorders and cures, from attention deficit disorder, borderline personality disorder, autism, anxiety, oppositional defiance disorder, depression, and everything in between. Medical intervention in their lives and personalities is not strange to them. It has been normalized. Many of these disorders have real and painful consequences, but they are also manifesting in societies that are broken, dissociated, and in a world that has been poisoned.
The communication now brought to the medical industry’s generation of children is that some humans are untethered to the biosphere (they are otherworldly people). This message is being propagated over all mainstream media by both the political left and the political right. It is being driven into children’s schools by rich, influential people and organizations with deep connections to the techno-medical complex. These messages were not here ten years ago. In the past decade, there has been a deluge of media propaganda selling us all on the idea that there are biological men and women and then another type of human - trans-humans, if you will.
International legal firms, financial investment houses, & Goliath NGOs have convinced us - at the very least, have us cowing to the concept - that people’s authentic selves can be born in the wrong body.
“Gender identity” ideology is not politically separate from business. Business is no longer separated from politics. We are governed by billionaires in finance who drive policy through our political and social institutions. A facade of democracy shrouds the oligarchic technocracy we live in, controlling this idea of alternate humans, just like the gender performances in gender ideology shroud the corporate profiteering from the colonization of human reproductive sex for profit & human engineering.
As reported recently by Gender Dissent (GD), an organization exposing the money and influence behind the gender industry in Canada, this process has been helped by cloaking this corporatism in a human rights frame.
In their report, GD elucidated a human rights document called the Yogyakarta Principles (YP), devised in 2007 and updated in 2017 to drive the concept of gender identity into law, reducing humans’ wholly sexed humanity to interchangeable commodities.
Principle 31 promotes that governments “end the registration of the sex and gender of persons in their identity documents.”
The original 29 signatories of the Yogyakarta Principles were brought together in 2007 by Canadian company Allied Rainbow Communities International (ARC International), also reported on by GD, which sent them to Yogyakarta, Indonesia, to craft the principles.
GD clarifies, “the principles are not a UN document and have never been discussed or ratified by any UN body.” Their report includes a document detailing how they came to be created.
ARC is funded by Arcus Foundation, the most significant LGBT NGO in America with global reach. Their funding mechanism is contingent on grantees adopting the concept of “gender ideology,” a complete myth dropped into western cultures a decade ago and driven by money and propaganda. In a 2008 meeting in Bellagio, Italy, Arcus Foundation hosted 29 leaders in global philanthropy that helped steer the YP and “gender identity” into the UN and western governments. Millions of dollars of medical corporation money fuel the Arcus Foundation. Jon Stryker is the foundation’s founder and is heir to a multi-billion-dollar ($17.1B at last count - up from $13.6B in 2020) medical supply corporation, Stryker Medical. Stryker Corporation spans 75 countries. The money funneled to the Arcus Foundation and, by extension, many other foundations and organizations give the profiteering and human engineering of the techno-medical industry in the name of “gender identity,” its veneer of human rights.
Technocratic elites have spent years discussing the virtual reality they seek to create. We will be enclosed and connected to everything and everyone else via bodiless minds without any roots in the biosphere. Elon Musk promotes his Neuralink, Ray Kurzweil, a Singularity, Martine Rothblatt’s Terasem movement, and Lifenaut organizations tout immortality in cyberspace. Mark Zuckerberg promises a utopia in his Metaverse, and Yuval Harari’s technological god will rid us of the cumbersome world of nature for something much more significant. Elites and corporations are investing in humans framed as otherworldly and not like the rest of us, rooted in biology, because they see profits and believe this is our future. The fascination of elites in “gender ideology” takes on a new light when seen in context. These “other” humans, as they are remade, each in their own image, will feed an already bloated techno-medical complex.
The changes to our biology, the way we think, and what we believe are being made manifest inside the techno-medical gulag we are ensnared in & given religious overtones by men who think they're god. Until we can unwind from the tale, we will be unable to help children who, like fish in water, simply flow with the current.
Too many of us are caught in the riptide-like tenets of this techno-religious cult already. It would be wise not to dismiss its draw. It has taken hold of many intelligent people. Inside the cult is a virtual reality with ethereal beings, & outside is real life, with real humans. We can still pull out of this cult, but each minute not spent resisting this dystopia is a moment we can’t get back.
This research depends on the generosity of readers like you. If you like what you are reading on this SubStack, please consider a donation
Thanks for reading Jennifer’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
There is definitely a coordinated push to label the trans discussion as a left/right issue. The fact is that the trans lobby may be part of the left, but it does not own the left.
TERFs are radical feminists. And, radical feminists were never conservative. Conservatives don't like feminists at all, let alone the radical feminists. Those radical feminists come from the left. They remain part of the left no matter how much the TRAs state otherwise. Feminists rightfully call the invasion of female spaces and erasure of the meaning of womanhood by TRAs what it is: regressive, sexist misogyny.
Increasingly, we also hear complaints about gender coming from LGB folks. Lesbians are increasingly vocal about straight trans women insisting lesbians accept them in their dating pool. The lesbians aren't interested in "chicks with dicks." Lesbians rightfully call this trans behavior what it is: homophobic.
There is also a lobby of folks who like to live in scientific reality. These include academics, biologists, medical students, and atheists. They dislike being intimidated. They dislike being silenced. They dislike the infection of our culture with ridiculous nonsense like pronoun declarations. They dislike the nonsense claims that "sex is binary," "sex is a social construct," "sex is a spectrum," "trans women ARE women," and "women are whoever identifies as a woman." No.
The groups opposing gender ideology are diverse. The supporters from the left shouldn't be mislabeled as coming from the right. That makes our entire argument easier to dismiss. "Only right-wing transphobes have a problem with gender. We can ignore them outright." No. The gender critical is a broad movement that's supported beyond just conservatives.
It is imperative that this analysis and research by Jennifer Bilek reaches a broad audience. Parents, and grandparents, mothers and grandmothers, teachers and affected professionsls are floundering as they witness the trans juggernaut capturing and destroying younger generations. Without this crucial context, they lack effective means of resistance. Thank you as always Jennifer.